How Do I Audit a Large Website Without Losing URL-Level Detail?
Keep every sitewide finding linked to the exact affected URLs, source fields and crawl scope.
Use focused crawl workbenches for status, metadata, canonicals, internal links, JavaScript rendering, sitemaps and data quality.
From the current state to the next verified decision
You set the crawl scope deliberately, work by technical decision through focused workbenches - status, metadata, canonicals, internal links, rendering, sitemaps, data quality - then export or assign the affected set. Each workbench keeps the per-URL evidence behind its summary, so a finding at scale never loses the pages that produced it.
-
1
Set the crawl scope
Verify the owned project and let the crawler discover same-host pages within the plan and safety limits.
-
2
Work by technical decision
Open the focused view for the signal you need instead of reading one undifferentiated issue export.
-
3
Export or assign the evidence
Filter the affected URL set, preserve the source fields and move the right subset into remediation.
Define the owned scope and required evidence before treating the crawl as complete.
Evidence and systems for this problem
Use a supporting system only after the problem and required evidence are clear. Its canonical page explains what evidence it can and cannot provide.
Crawl Explorer
Inspect every URL captured in your project crawl, and turn each supported technical finding into an action.
See how it supports the workflowSite Health Audit
A source-aware technical checklist that prioritizes supported findings and records fresh rechecks.
See how it supports the workflowSite Trust & Security
A bounded scorecard for captured site trust signals, headers and supported external probes.
See how it supports the workflowStart with the evidence this problem needs
Open the workflow or guidance that supplies the evidence for the next supported action.
What to know before you begin
What outcome does this solution support?
Use focused crawl workbenches for status, metadata, canonicals, internal links, JavaScript rendering, sitemaps and data quality.
What evidence should I review before I act?
Review these signals before choosing the next action: Per-URL crawl and render evidence, Focused diagnostic workbenches, Filterable exports and affected sets.
What should I start with?
Define the owned scope and required evidence before treating the crawl as complete.
What are the evidence boundaries?
Coverage is limited to reachable, permitted pages and the applicable project limits; private or blocked pages are not silently inferred.
Related solutions
Turn this problem into the next action you can verify.
Capture the relevant evidence, take the supported action and recheck the same condition.